# Coherently driven degenerate three-level laser with parametric amplifier

- Tewodros Y Darge
^{1}Email author and - Fesseha Kassahun
^{1}

**3**:1

**DOI: **10.1186/1754-0429-3-1

© Darge and Kassahun 2010

**Received: **1 January 2010

**Accepted: **24 March 2010

**Published: **24 March 2010

## Abstract

We discuss the squeezing and statistical properties of the light produced by a coherently driven degenerate three-level laser with a parametric amplifier. We consider the case in which the atoms injected into the cavity are prepared in a coherent superposition of the top and bottom levels and with these levels coupled by the pump mode emerging from the parametric amplifier. It so happens that the presence of the parametric amplifier increases the squeezing and the mean photon number significantly. Furthermore, it is found that the maximum interacavity squeezing is 93% in the presence of the coupling and when the superposition has no contribution (*η* = 0). On the other hand, the maximum interacavity squeezing turns out to be 94% in the absence of the coupling. This squeezing is due to the parametric amplifier and the superposition. In addition, our calculation shows that one effect of coupling the top and bottom levels is to decrease the mean and the normally-ordered variance of the photon number.

**PACS codes:** 42.55.Ah, 42.50.Lc, 42.50.Ar

## 1 Introduction

It has been established that a three-level laser under certain conditions generates squeezed light [1–9]. In a cascade three-level laser, three-level atoms in a cascade configuration are injected into a cavity coupled to a vacuum reservoir via a single-port mirror. The injected atoms may initially be prepared in a coherent superposition of the top and bottom levels and/or these levels may be coupled by strong coherent light after they are injected into the cavity. The superposition or the coupling of the top and bottom levels is responsible for the interesting nonclassical features of the generated light. When a three-level atom in a cascade configuration makes a transition from the top to the bottom level via the intermediate level, two photons are generated. If the two photons have the same frequency, the three-level atom is called degenerate otherwise it is called nondegenerate.

Some authors have studied the squeezing and statistical properties of the light produced by a three-level laser in which the crucial role is played by the superposition of the top and bottom levels [1–7]. Ansari [7] has predicted that such a laser can generate under certain conditions squeezed light. Furthermore, Lu and Zhu [2] have considered a nondegenerate three-level laser with the atoms initially prepared in coherent superposition of the top and bottom levels. They have predicted a maximum of 50% interacavity two-mode squeezing.

A three-level laser in which the top and bottom levels of the atoms injected into the cavity are coupled by a strong light has also been studied by different authors [7–9]. Ansari *et al* [9] have considered a degenerate three-level laser, with the atoms initially in the upper level and with the top and bottom levels of the atoms coupled by coherent light. They have shown that this system behaves like a parametric oscillator for sufficiently strong coherent light. They have also predicted that such a system can generate squeezed light over large range of the amplitude of the coherent light.

Furthermore, it has been predicted theoretically [10–16] and subsequently confirmed experimentally [17, 18] that a parametric oscillator produces light with a maximum interacavity squeezing of 50% below the coherent-state level. Some authors [19, 20] have considered a three-level laser whose cavity contains a parametric amplifier. Fesseha [19] has studied a three-level laser whose cavity contains a degenerate parametric amplifier, and with the injected atoms prepared initially in coherent superposition of the top and bottom levels. He has shown that the effect of the parametric amplifier is to increase the interacavity squeezing by a maximum of 50%. He has also pointed out that since the presence of the parametric amplifier also leads to a significant increase in the mean photon number, the system can produce a bright and highly squeezed light. Moreover, Alebachew and Fesseha [20] have considered a degenerate three-level laser whose cavity contains a parametric amplifier, with the top and bottom levels of the injected atoms coupled by the pump mode emerging from the parametric amplifier. They have studied this system for the specific case in which the number of atoms initially in the top and bottom levels are equal. They have found that this system generates under certain conditions a highly squeezed light. The squeezing in this case is exclusively due to the parametric amplifier and the coupling of the top and bottom levels.

*Q*function is determined. The resulting

*Q*function is then used to calculate the mean and the normally-ordered variance of the photon number as well as the photon number distribution for the cavity mode.

## 2 c-number Langevin Equations

*a*⟩, |

*b*⟩, and |

*c*⟩, respectively. We assume the transitions |

*a*⟩ → |

*b*⟩ and |

*b*⟩ → |

*c*⟩ to be dipole allowed, with the transition

*|a*⟩ → |

*c*⟩ to be dipole forbidden. We consider the case for which the cavity mode is at resonance with the two transitions |

*a*⟩ → |

*b*⟩ and |

*b*⟩ → |

*c*⟩. We take the initial state of a three-level atom to be

*η*describes the coherent superposition of the top and bottom levels at the initial time. Upon setting

*g*is the atom-cavity mode coupling constant (assumed to be the same for all the three-levels), Ω = 2

*λβ*

_{0}(with

*β*

_{0}and

*λ*being the amplitude of the pump mode and the atom-pump mode coupling constant),

*ε*=

*λ'β*

_{0}(with

*λ'*being the coupling constant between the pump mode and the signal mode), and

*μ*is proportional to the amplitude of the driving light. Now taking into account the interaction of the cavity mode with the vacuum reservoir and for

*θ*= 0, the master equation for the cavity mode of the quantum optical system under consideration is found in the linear and adiabatic approximation schemes to be [3]

Here *γ*, considered to be the same for all the three-levels, is the atomic decay constant and *A* is the linear gain coefficient.

*α*(

*t*) (c-number Langevin equation) can be obtained from that of ⟨

*α*(

*t*)⟩. This can be achieved by dropping the angular brackets in Eq. (23) and adding a noise force

*f*(

*t*), so that

## 3 Quadrature Squeezing of the Cavity Mode

*λ*

_{+}is nonnegative while

*λ*

_{-}can be positive, negative, or zero. It turns out to be useful to write (46) as

We observe that the equation of evolution of *α*_{-}(*t*), described by (31), does not have a well-behaved solution for *ε* > *G*. We then identify *ε* = *G* as the threshold condition.

*A*= 100 and

*κ*= 0.8 the values of

*η*,

*β*,

*ε*, and for which (31) has a solution. It so turns out that this equation has a solution for -0.5 ≤

*η*≤ 1 and for 0 ≤

*β*≤ 1.4. We indicate in Table 1 the values of

*η*,

*β*, and

*ε*corresponding to the two smallest values of the quadrature variance. We note that when there are equal number of atoms initially in the top and bottom levels (

*η*= 0), the maximum interacavity squeezing is 93% below the coherent-state level for

*β*= 0.1. On the other hand, when there are slightly more atoms initially in the bottom level than in the top level (

*η*= 0.1), the maximum interacavity squeezing is found to be 94% below the coherent-state level for

*β*= 0.

*ε*= 0 (with

*β*

_{0}≠ 0) in Eq. (47), we get

*η*= 0,

*β*= 0, and any values of

*A*and

*κ*the light generated is not in a squeezed state. However, for

*η*= 0,

*A*= 100, and

*κ*= 0.8 we readily get applying the same equation that the maximum squeezing to be 89% for

*β*= 0. We therefore infer that the squeezing in this case is exclusively due to the coupling of the top and bottom levels. Moreover, for

*η*= 0.1 and for the above values of

*A*and

*κ*, we find the maximum squeezing to be 88% for

*β*= 0. This squeezing is exclusively due to the superposition of the top and bottom levels. In addition, inspection of the plots in Figure 2 shows that for small values of the amplitude of the pump mode, the coupling of the top and bottom levels significantly enhances the intracavity squeezing particularly when there are equal number of atoms initially in the top and bottom levels (

*η*= 0). Otherwise, it leads to the decrease in the intercavity squeezing. On the other hand, for a strong pump mode (

*β*≫ 1), Eq. (50) takes the form

This result indicates that a degenerate three-level laser driven by a strong light behaves like a degenerate parametric oscillator [9].

*β*= 0 (with

*β*

_{0}≠ 0), Eq. (47) reduces to [19]

It is apparent that *ε* is the only parameter representing the parametric amplifier. And inspection of Eq. (53) shows that one effect of the parametric amplifier is to decrease the value of the variance of the minus quadrature.

## 4 Quadrature Squeezing of the Output Mode

## 5 Photon Statistics of the Cavity Mode

*Q*function. The

*Q*function for a single-mode light can be written as

*α'*(

*t*) can be written as

*α'*(

*t*) is a Gaussian variable. In addition, on account of (60) along with the assumption that the cavity mode is initially in a vacuum state, we easily see that ⟨

*α'*(

*t*)⟩ = 0. Hence

*α'*(

*t*) is a Gaussian variable with a vanishing mean. One can then express (61) in the form [3]

### 5.1 Mean and variance of the photon number

*Q*function as

*A*(

*α*) is the c-number function corresponding to the operator function in the antinormal order. The mean of the photon number for the cavity mode can therefore be written as

*η*. This must be due to stimulated emission induced by the pump mode. The photons emitted this way are not included in the mean photon number for the cavity mode.

*n*

^{2}and being the variance and the mean of the photon number for the cavity mode. Furthermore, the variance of the photon number can be expressed as

### 5.2 Photon number distribution

*Q*function as [3]

*Q*function (69), the photon number distribution for the cavity mode under consideration is found to be

*μ*= 0). Thus upon setting

*μ*= 0 in Eq. (36), we get

*n*and for odd

*n*. As can be seen from Figure 8 the steady-state photon number distribution decreases with the photon number. Though the photons are generated in pairs in this quantum optical system, there is a finite probability to find odd number of photons inside the cavity. This is due to the damping of the cavity mode. In addition, the probability of finding even number of photons is in general greater than the probability of finding odd number of photons. One can also obtain using Eq. (90) that the probability of finding

*n*photons, with

*n*≤ 17, is smaller for the light generated by the three-level laser with the parametric amplifier. And the opposite of this holds for

*n*> 17.

## 6 Conclusions

In this paper we have seen the simplicity with which the squeezing and statistical properties of the light, generated by a coherently driven degenerate three-level lasers whose cavity contains a parametric amplifier, could be analyzed with the aid of c-number Langevin equations. Applying the solutions of these equations, we have calculated the quadrature variance for the cavity and output modes. Our results show that the presence of the parametric amplifier increases the squeezing of the light generated by the system under consideration, while the driving light has no effect on the squeezing. Furthermore, it so happens that for small values of the amplitude of the pump mode, the coupling of the top and bottom levels enhances the degree of the intracavity squeezing significantly for *η* = 0. Otherwise, it leads to a decrease in the intercavity squeezing.

It so turns out that for *η* = 0, *A* = 100, and *κ* = 0.8 the maximum interacavity squeezing is 93% below the coherent-state level (occurs at *β* = 0.1). This squeezing is exclusively due to the parametric amplifier and the coupling of the top and bottom levels. Furthermore, for *η* = 0.1 and the above values of *A* and *κ* the maximum interacavity squeezing is found to be 94% below the coherent-state level (occurs at *β* = 0). This squeezing is due to the parametric amplifier and the superposition of the top and bottom levels. In addition, we have shown that the cavity mode squeezing is greater than the output mode squeezing by 19%. On the other hand, we have determined via the *Q* function the mean and the normally-ordered variance of the photon number and the photon number distribution for the cavity mode. From the results we have found, we note that the driving coherent light and the parametric amplifier increase the mean of the photon number significantly. We have seen that one effect of the coupling of the top and bottom levels is to decrease the mean and normally-ordered variance of the photon number. This could be due to stimulated emission induced by the pump mode. The photons emitted this way do not contribute to the mean photon number of the cavity mode. Furthermore, we have also observed that the photon number statistics is super-Poissonian. In addition, we have found that there is a finite probability to find odd number of photons inside the cavity.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

One of the authors, Tewodros, would like to thank the Abdus Salam ICTP for financial support.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Scully MO, Zubairy MS: Opt Commun. 1988, 66: 303-10.1016/0030-4018(88)90419-1.View ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
- Lu N, Zhu SY: Phys Rev A. 1990, 41: 2865-10.1103/PhysRevA.41.2865.View ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
- Fesseha K: Fundamentals of Quantum Optics (Lulu, North Carolina). 2008Google Scholar
- Scully MO, Wodkiewicz K, Zubairy MS, Bergou J, Lu N, Meyerter Veh J: Phys Rev Lett. 1988, 60: 1832-10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.1832.View ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
- Anwar J, Zubairy MS: Phys Rev A. 1994, 49: 481-10.1103/PhysRevA.49.481.View ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
- Lu N, Zhu SY: Phys Rev A. 1989, 40: 5735-10.1103/PhysRevA.40.5735.View ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
- Ansari NA: Phys Rev A. 1993, 48: 4686-10.1103/PhysRevA.48.4686.View ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
- Tesfa S: J Phys B: At Mol Opt Phys. 2008, 41: 145501-10.1088/0953-4075/41/14/145501.View ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
- Ansari NA, Gea-Banacloche J, Zubairy MS: Phys Rev A. 1990, 41: 5179-10.1103/PhysRevA.41.5179.View ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
- Anwar J, Zubairy MS: Phys Rev A. 1992, 45: 1804-10.1103/PhysRevA.45.1804.View ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
- Fesseha K: Opt commun. 1998, 156: 145-10.1016/S0030-4018(98)00425-8.View ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
- Agrawal GS, Adam G: Phys Rev A. 1989, 39: 6259-10.1103/PhysRevA.39.6259.View ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
- Vyas R, Singh S: Phys Rev A. 1989, 40: 5147-10.1103/PhysRevA.40.5147.View ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
- Daniel B, Fesseha K: Opt Commun. 1998, 151: 384-10.1016/S0030-4018(98)00039-X.View ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
- Collet MJ, Gardiner CW: Phys Rev A. 1984, 30: 1386-10.1103/PhysRevA.30.1386.View ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
- Milburn GJ, Walls DF: Phys Rev A. 1983, 27: 392-10.1103/PhysRevA.27.392.View ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
- Wu LA, Xiao M, Kimble HJ: J Opt Soc Am B. 1987, 4: 1465-10.1364/JOSAB.4.001465.View ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
- Xiao M, Wu LA, Kimble HJ: Phys Rev Lett. 1992, 59: 278-10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.278.View ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
- Fesseha K: Phys Rev A. 2001, 63: 033811-10.1103/PhysRevA.63.033811.View ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
- Alebachew E, Fesseha K: Opt Commun. 2006, 265: 314-10.1016/j.optcom.2006.03.017.View ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
- Barnett SM, Radmore PM: Methods in Theoretical Quantum Optics. 1997, Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.